а я как-то давно уже свыкся с мыслью, что не надо искать супер аутентичности и достоверности в худфильмах "основаных на реальных событиях". как говорится - похоже, ну и гоже.

Да я сам собираюсь дрищевать на Lone Survivor. Если бы меня с подсумками один гандон норвежский не кинул, уже в ноябрю был бы готов стоять в кино за мороженое

I’d rather hear a debate about the original 8-12 enemy combatants that some how morphed into hundred over time.

Luttrell claimed in his book that they were ambushed by the insurgents after deciding to spare goat herders who stumbled across them in the desert.
He claimed the herders must have informed the Taliban of their location, which led to them being found.
But while being interviewed by novelist Patrick Robinson, Gulab - who has never read Luttrell's version of events - said the SEALs were caught because their helicopter landing was heard for miles.
He added that the Taliban fighters found the men as they were deciding whether to kill or free the goat herders, and that the insurgents waited for the locals to leave before launching their attack.
Lutrell claimed there were between 80 and 200 militants firing at the four SEALs, saying 'we must have killed 50 or more of them'.
Lutrell (pictured third from right, with fellow SEALs) claimed there were between 80 and 200 militants firing at the four SEALs, saying 'we must have killed 50 or more of them'
Lutrell claimed there were between 80 and 200 militants firing at the four SEALs, saying 'we must have killed 50 or more of them'
But Gulab said a lower Naval Special Warfare Command estimate of 35 Taliban fighters killed in the firefight was still far too high, adding that villagers and US forces looked for the bodies of insurgents killed and could not find any.
Luttrell also said that he and his group almost ran out of ammunition, and that he took 11 full rounds with him on the day of the battle.
But Gulab told Robinson that Luttrell still had 11 magazines with him when he was rescued by the villagers the next day.