Всегда пожалуйста!
Что интересно и на нее есть развернутая рецензия. Похоже для англичан, особенно ветеранов, эта тема до сих пор животрепещет.
Operation Paraquet South Georgia. Reviewed in the United Kingdom on 28 November 2021 Sea King Down’ is an interesting read and one that will go down well with those who enjoy all things SAS. Readers cannot not fail to be moved by the individual bravery of certain individuals, or the tragedy that befell the Sea King and I fall into that category, despite my comments in this review. However and not for the first time, the author’s Squadron Commander has already deliberately done the same, this account, certainly as far as Operation Paraquet is concerned, tells a grossly distorted story of what actually happened on 25th April 1982. Others may judge the accuracy of the narrative after South Georgia.
D Squadron’s unauthorised superimposition on the CinC’s operationally designated Land Force - M Company Group found from 42 Commando RM is well documented elsewhere; as are the duplicitous actions enabled by SAS TACSAT communications operating outside the formal MoD operational chain of command, not least the deliberate but unsuccessful intent to marginalise the Commander Land Force [CLF] Major Guy Sheridan RM. A Royal Marine Officer specially selected for his internationally recognised expertise of mountain and arctic warfare. Sheridan was the ideal man for the [CLF] task. The author's contention that Sheridan approved the Fortuna Glacier debacle is not correct. On the contrary, he specifically ordered OC D Squadron not to plan recce insertions anywhere near glaciated terrain. This advice was endorsed by Captain Barker of HMS Endurance, UK’s Antarctic Ice Patrol vessel; a man who knew the hostile terrain and meteorological conditions of South Georgia intimately. Prevailed upon by OC D Squadron, the Commander Task Group [CTG], the Captain of HMS Antrim inexplicably, overruled Sheridan and Barker and authorised the ensuing but predicted mission-threatening disaster. The SAS failed to make any progress on the glacier incurring cold weather injuries and had to be rescued in a completely avoidable and hazardous operation which deprived the Task Group of its only 2 troop carrying helicopters and the Troop concerned of its weapons and equipment. Building on failure, 24 hours later, elements of D Squadron needed a further rescue when Boat Troop’s insertion on to Grass Island also went embarrassingly wrong in unusually benign weather conditions.
The threat of an obsolete Argentine submarine resulted in the CTG sending his main assault force, M Company Group in RFA Tidespring 200 miles away without consulting his CLF. The truth is that immediate contingency planning by the CLF and OC M Company, in which OC D Squadron played no part, identified a reduced landing force of 75 men: consisting of three fighting troops plus a tactical HQ made up from personnel available in HMS Antrim. Again the author is misleading readers when he infers the subsequent landing was a D Squadron operation mounted by 110 men at least half of whom were SAS. In truth, the operation was ordered and commanded by Sheridan, of the 75 men who took part only 20 came from D Squadron who formed one of the troops, the other 55 ranks were Royal Marines and Royal Navy commandos. The final assault was successful but not without drama, Mountain Troop had been tasked to advance to the slopes of Brown Mountain to dominate the high ground and afford cover for the advancing troops to pass through them. Despite what is written, there were no enemy positions on Brown Mountain or the approaches to Grytviken, there was no intensive fire, because the Argentines surrendered without firing a shot! What is true is that Sheridan having landed expected Brown Mountain to be secured. It had not been, I was there and witnessed an angry Sheridan give some very terse instructions to the SAS commander to get up from his prone position, sort out his troop and get moving.
Shortly after this OC D Squardron left his men on Brown Mountain and with a couple of others moved off towards King Edward Point (KEP) disobeying Sheridan’s orders to halt and a warning that the approaches might be mined. His sole intention was to raise the Union Flag in KEP and secure a Flashman-esque 15 minutes of fame. The reader should contrast this with extracts from the London Gazette which credits OC D Squadron with leading his men into Cumberland Bay on the 21st April, [erroneously four days before it actually happened!] by employing two SAS troops he captured Grytviken without loss of life, further that he led his men coolly directing operations under intensive fire from the enemy. It just did not happen that way at all, the assault took place on the 25th April, there was only one SAS troop of 20 men and there was definitely no enemy fire.
The 55 men of the 2 Royal Marines troops and Sheridan’s HQ entered KEP and began to manage the Argentine 100+ garrison. The remaining 17 or so SAS were the last to arrive and played no part in securing the objective or the prisoners. Thoroughly, exasperated by the actions of D Squadron and their commander, Sheridan ordered the SAS to leave KEP and return to HMS Antrim which they did. Therefore the author’s account of the part played by the SAS in KEP comes from the realms of fantasy and can be refuted by those of us who were there and took charge. The author had not arrived in King Edward Point at the point the Argentine casualty was treated and it was M Company’s medical team who gave further treatment to the casualty with an already amputated leg who then evacuated him to HMS Antrim. Captain Bicain could not have expressed his gratitude to them for the treatment his crew member received, giving yet another misleading impression of SAS involvement in that matter, by omission of fact. Not surprisingly the author seems disappointed the raising of the flag by his Sergeant Major was not mentioned later, clearly hoping it might have been mentioned in Mrs Thatcher’s Downing Street announcement of Task Force success. It lends credence however to the desperation of the SAS to be seen as the ones credited for retaking South Georgia. In response to the author’s comments regarding POW’s, the SAS in fact had no dealings with the POW’s who were the responsibility of M Company Group. The SAS had been ordered off South Georgia by the CLF.
The author quite rightly states that the remainder of M Company arrived the following day but is again mischievously misleading when he states they were “detailed to take over from them” the implication being it was again the SAS in control of things and thereby giving the impression that all others involved were purely in a supporting role, this is patently untrue and again can be proved so. Operation Paraquet was a close run thing but not because of the actions of the enemy. Instead success was threatened by the actions of those who sought to undermine the operational chain of command for their own ends and sadly 40-years on continue to wilfully seek to distort the truth. It fortunately ended successfully due to good leadership, good planning by those who have never sought approbation but whom now have to put the record straight far too often. A very telling quote from the book ‘Nine Battles to Stanley’ by an Army Intelligence Officer “One SAS veteran from D Squadron later claimed that they alone could have defeated the Argentines in the Falkland Islands, as events would show, this was misplaced” Summing up perfectly the attitude and contribution of D Squadron in South Georgia.
|